• +251 115 527666
  • +251 115 572779
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • By Eshetu Dub 

    The role of Micro and Small Scale Enterprises (MSEs) is one of the major issues that grab the attention of politicians and economists. The dominant position often held by these two groups has arguably obscured the understanding of MSEs, even though they deserve credit for putting the issue at the top of public policy agenda.

  • A few days before the thought of writing this article came to my mind, I and my friends visited a Sun Optics shop close to our office. In the middle of trying and testing a variety of models, the lady in the shop gave us one fancy glass with one company brand on it (a company which is a global leader in production of environmentally friendly products). I was the first to try it and it fitted me well. My friends also liked itThen came the price deal with the lady.


    New York Public Relations
    New York Public Relations

    After she complimented that the glass looked nice on me, she quoted a very inflated price for it. I was surprised because I have never imagined I would pay that amount for a solar eyeglass. While I was searching for the justification of the exaggerated price, my friend made a joke on me that sparked the main idea for this article. In his own words, he says “you are an environmentalist, you have to live by what you are preaching. You should buy this brand as it is produced in an environmentally friendly way and the material is 100 percent recyclable.” Later in that day, this satire came to my mind so repeatedly that I reflected on it deeply to give it a shape. Out of this process one big question arises: “why are people not motivated to act on environmental and climate issues while the consequence of inaction seems so evident?” That’s a big why.

    People find comfort in uncomfortable situations for many reasons. To highlight some of them: first, climate change mitigation involves tradeoff between present and future benefit which is one of the hardest choices to make for consumers. At an individual level, for instance, this may involve changing the car they drive, the product they consume and the house they live in. At an organizational level, on the other hand, the act to commit to climate change mitigation may demand investing on new technology and process which aim to considerably reduce emission. On a much bigger scale, a government that tends to commit to climate change initiatives may invest on green source of energy and avoid combustible sources of energy, which may not help to win the voters’ heart in the short-termSecond, climate change is a non-linear problem which is difficult for humans to comprehend its effect (a function which increases slowly at the beginning but then accelerate). A simple analogy to this effect is to think why some people continue to smoke for a long time while they know smoking is detrimental to their health. Through time the effect of smoking builds exponentially until the individual become conscious of it and by which time it may be too late to reverse the negative health effect. Third, the effect of climate change is too distant for many people to consider it tangibly. Studies on construal theory level suggest that when things are psychologically distant (socially, in terms of time and space) people consider it at an abstract level than when things are psychologically close to them. Fourth, the future is always associated with high uncertainty than the present, thus people value the present much more than the future. What if human activity will not have dire consequence on climate as commonly believed?


    A big department store in New York of public relations in 2018/19


    Is climate crisis really distant and abstract for an individual consumer to consider it in his/her buying decision? I highly doubt it. Haven’t we witnessed recently how our weather has changed so drastically that sometimes we become confused to tell precisely which season we are in? Haven’t we witnessed drought in places where talking about it used to be a fairy-tale land? Haven’t we witnessed severe rain and flood in places where these issues were not used to be a problem? In fact, some of the evidence regarding the impact of climate change is so daunting that an average person cannot afford being inactive and ignorant about it. For instance, in its latest report the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) argues that if Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission continues at the current rate, the atmosphere will warm up by about 2.7 OF (1.5 OC) in 2040 above the preindustrial level, which is just enough to inundate coastlines and intensify poverty and drought. If the temperature rise reaches 3.6OF (2OC) (the previous threshold for estimating climate change damage), the IPCC report predicts a disproportionately rapid evacuation of people from the tropics and in some parts of the world national borders will become irrelevant because of flood.

    Here one point should be clear. The climate issue is a systematic and interlinked problem which is very difficult to define in one single way. At the very least it encompasses society, business, government and the whole world. For instance, my purchasing decision at the optician’s shop on that day is affected by a multitude of factors including climate awareness, budget, personal values, group norms, society values, business provisions, government incentives, and local and world climate politics

    Flex Fashion

    2 February 2019

    By Contributor

    should aim to establish environmental priorities in investment approval and build a system which will recognize and incentivize environmental champions, writes Abiy Getachew.


    We are a friendly firm of Financial Advisors from an advertising agencywho are happy to meet with you face to face or liaise with you via the phone or email to provide a service that’s right for you. Our Services included offering advice and solutions on Mortgages, Insurance, Financial Protection, Investments and Pensions. Our aim is to leave you worry free about your finances because you know they are in safe hands!

    NY 2018/19

    The interlink between government, business and society can best be depicted by my experience in one of the Scandinavian cities. During my stay in the city, I have come to know one individual who has a cleaning company with about four employees. His company provides cleaning services for individuals and small companies. In one of our conversations, I raised a question about the city’s environmental regulation. To my surprise he told me that the government regularly has given environmental training free of charge to companies even as small as his. Moreover, the city administration also occasionally consults with him to see whether employees are working in a safe and healthy working environment. This implies that abiding by the city’s environmental regulation is not only a requirement which is nice to have, but also provides him with business opportunities. This is so because companies that do not pass the environmental criteria cannot participate in the cleaning bid (most individual consumers also demand this requirement).

    Numerous researches also highlight that part of the reason for pushing the corporate world in that direction is the ever-higher expectations from the society that business should be part of the solution in the recent global challenges. The other subtle reason is that in some instances regulatory changes leads to direct commercial benefits by creating new market that does not exist before or giving competitive advantages for those companies which are able to capitalize on the new regulations. Nevertheless, does this mean businesses go green just for the sake of good public perception even if that does mean short-term loss?  Researches on this line maintain that corporate initial statement of climate leadership is eventually degenerated into the usual business activities (through three stages). That means climate change initiatives begin with executives presenting it both internally and externally as an urgent social and strategic business issues (framing stage). But, through time (localizing stage), the climate change initiative will be upturned, and the blatant sales issues will prevail again. At this stage (normalizing stage), corporate executives, who have been committed to climate change mitigation, will try to realign climate initiatives with the basic logic of corporate shareholder value maximization. Hence, the initiative to go green ultimately boils down to the question of “does this contribute to the bottom line (profit)?” As one senior manager in an insurance company acknowledged “Look, that was all a nice thing to have in good times but now we’re in hard times. We get back to core stuff.”  Hence, in order to save our planet from climate crises, we should imagine the future that goes beyond corporate self-regulation and market forces.

    Gloria MacIntosh

    The good news is that in agreement with business leaders’ action (framing stages), company employee conversation about sustainability and climate change is also rising. Hence, businesses can use this in their advertising, social media and in their product package to directly talk to their consumers. This is exactly what I faced at the optician’s. I saw the product logo and a description of its production process, but I still acted to the contrary. I did choose a cheaper one irrespective of its relatively higher carbon footprint, a behavior which may best be explained by “the tragedy of the common goods” theory. According to this concept, an environment is a non-excludable but rival good which falls under the common resources. In this context, a rational consumer who want to act in a socially desirable way (like me) needs to bear the societal cost while the benefit of it will spread to the whole society. Marginally speaking, the cost is higher than the benefit implying that the consumer will be better off acting in his own interest, disregarding the societal benefit.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Therefore, the most important question is, what can we (Ethiopians) learn from the world best practices? On an individual level we need to be aware of the climate crisis and be motivated to consider company’s environmental record when making purchase decision, even if that means paying slightly higher for environmentally friendly products. Policymakers on other hand should aim to establish environmental priorities in investment approval and build a system which will recognize and incentivize environmental champions. This in turn lowers the cost of production and prices for these products. Finally, businesses have to rethink their traditional investment decision criteria in order to change climate change risks (including regulatory risks) into opportunities. In other words, if businesses are able to find opportunities within those climate related risks, both the business and environment can win. Thus, it is possible to go green and still be profitable.

    Ed.’s Note: Abiy Getachew is a consultant at HST consulting PLC. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of The Reporter. He can be reached at   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

     

  • By Abiy Getachew 

    A few days before the thought of writing this article came to my mind, I and my friends visited a Sun Optics shop close to our office. In the middle of trying and testing a variety of models, the lady in the shop gave us one fancy glass with one company brand on it (a company which is a global leader in production of environmentally friendly products). I was the first to try it and it fitted me well. My friends also liked itThen came the price deal with the lady.After she complimented that the glass looked nice on me, she quoted a very inflated price for it. I was surprised because I have never imagined I would pay that amount for a solar eyeglass.

  • By Zekrie Negatu 

    Odious debt, also known as illegitimate debt, arises when  a country’s government misappropriates money  it has borrowed from other countries. A nation’s debt is considered odious  debt when  government leaders use borrowed funds in ways that do not benefit their citizens,  and to the contrary, use the resources so obtained to oppress their people. Some legal scholars argue that, for moral reasons, these debts should  not have to be repaid, writes Zekrie Negatu.

     

  • By Brook Abdu

    A local consulting company, HST Consulting Plc, has won a bid to develop a Human Resource Strategy document for the Ethiopian Reinsurance Company S.C. for around 2.1 million birr.

    The strategy will assist Ethiopian Re get a comprehensive Human Resource Strategy and Human Resource Management Manual in accordance to its vision.

    “We place a great value in creating relationship with Ethiopian Reinsurance S.C. and are committed to delivering excellence and value as we serve Ethiopian Re. We also appreciate the importance of this project and its role in supporting to successfully implementing the Company’s overall strategy and objectives,” said HST’s managing director Solomon Gizaw in an email reply given to The Reporter.

    The strategy will be developed benchmarking best practices of other insurance companies abroad and the implementation will take three to five years.

    The bid was announced for the “review and development of comprehensive human resource strategy and human resource management.” The bid document which was sold for a 100 birr and 50,000 birr bid bond attracted KPMG and HST.

    HST will complete the strategy in January or February 2019.

    According to Solomon, while the company was a partner of Deloitte, it had engaged in similar endeavors including the same project for Ethiopian Insurance Corporation and Bank of Abyssinia.

    Yewondwossen Eteffa, the CEO of Ethiopian Re, told The Reporter that the company will begin its tasks on August 27, during which it will first develop the schedule and the deliverables.

    “We have a strategic plan for 2027 during which we want to be the leading reinsurance company in Africa,” Yewondwossen stated. “As a company that plans to do business at a continental level as well as in the middle and far eastern countries; we need human resources that fits both in terms of number and development.”

    He added that the terms of reference for the bid were prepared accordingly. Mentioning the absence of actuaries [professionals who deal with the measurement and management of risk and uncertainty] in the country, the strategy will come up with a concrete plan to continue hiring from abroad or to train in-house experts.

    “It will be far seeing including forecasts of government regulations regarding the industry,” he said.

    Ethiopian Reinsurance Company was established as the first reinsurance company in the country and commenced operations in July 2016. Its registered capital is a billion birr while its paid-up capital amounts to half of that.

    The shareholders of the company are insurance companies in the country, banks, and others. It has seven Banks, seventeen insurance companies, eighty individuals coming from different walks of life and one trade union as its shareholders.

    Article From Reporter 

  • HST Consulting Plc, which recently broke its ties with one of the leading global consultancy firms, Deloitte Leadership, has acquired the local firm Encore Employment, Training & Consultancy Services Plc as of October 1, 2017.

    "The acquisition came as a bold move to strengthen our advisory and centre of excellence," reads a press release from HST.

    Founded in 2006 by Zekrie Negatu, Getachew Zewdie and Hailu Zeleke, professionals from teaching, training and consulting in management, accounting, finance and development areas, Encore was sold to HST after a two-month long negotiation between the two. The management of both companies declined to disclose the transaction amount.

    "The demand from the economy pushed us to associate with HST," said Getachew, co-founder of Encore. "The economy is demanding diversified and advanced advisory services, which cannot be fulfilled as Encore."

    The total asset of Encore will be transferred to HST, according to Teshome Bekele, lecturer of International Marketing at Addis Abeba University College of Business & Economics. But the transfer is not mandatory for the human resource as it will be done based on the agreement of the two parties.

    The directors of Encore will take similar positions within HST, leading in their specialised service areas. Zekrie will be the director of HST's Corporate Finance Function, Getachew will be the director of Strategy & Innovation Function, and Hailu will be director of Research & Industries Development Function.

  • by Malcom Gladwell 

    with little modification by Abiy Getachew.

    Who do you think know you best? A close friend or a total stranger with a very minimal clue? A psychologist Samuel Gosling has proofed the effectiveness of thin slicing by using the cases of judging peoples’ personality.

    A personality workup on a group of 80 college students is conducted using the big five inventories (a very specialized multi-item questionnaire that measures personality across five categories). 1. Extraversion: are you social or retiring 2. Agreeableness: are you sociable or retiring 3. Conscientious: are you organized or disorganized 4. Emotional stability: are you worried or calm 5. Openness to new experience: are you imaginative or down to earth.

    In one group Gosling has made close friends of those 80 students to fill the questioner.  Gosling wanted to know how closely they come to reality. Not surprisingly, our friends describe us accurately. They have a thick slice of who we are that translate into our real being. Gosling repeat the same process but this time with total strangers who have never met the students they are judging. Gosling gave them a clipboard and told them they have fifteen minutes to look at their dorm rooms and answer a serious of questions about the occupants of the room. On a scale of 1 to 5 does the inhabitants of the room talkative? Tend to find fault with others? Does a thorough job? Is original? Is reserved? Is helpful and unselfish with others and so on. Gosling is careful not to tell the subjects what to do. He is just trying to study every impression. With that regard he tells his subject “here is your questionnaire. Go into the room and drink it in”. He is just trying to investigate intuitive judgment process.

    And the result? the dorm room observants are not nearly as good as friends in measuring extraversion. This makes sense. If you want to know whether someone is animated, talkative and outgoing you need to meet him or her in person. The friends also did better in accurately predicting agreeableness. This also makes sense according to Malcom Gladwell. However, on the other 3 of the five measures, dorm room observants stand out on the top. They were more accurate at measuring a student’s conscientious. And they are even more accurate at measuring both a student’s emotional stability and openness to new experience. On overall then the strangers are doing better.

    This suggest that it is quite possible for strangers who have never met us but only spent 20 min thinking about us to come to know us much better than people who spend years with us. Hence, Malcom argues to forget the endless getting to know meetings and lunches. If you want to get a good idea of whether I would make a good employee, drop by one day in my house and look around.

    blinkTwo Examples of thin slicing at work 

    Example two

    Around 1980's the market share of Coca Cola is diminishing while Pepsi is gaining more of it and Coca Cola and Pepsi are in fierce competition. during this time Pepsi open a program known as a "Pepsi Challenge" in which people are blindfolded and given two cups, one filled with Pepsi and another with Coca Cola. Surprisingly, most people who takes a sip from both cups chooses Pepsi be their favorite (56% to 44%). After repeating the same experiment themselves, Coke people believe that Pepsi beat Coke in product quality. Hence Coke laboratory experts go back to the root product composition and flicker it a bit to make it sweeter and lighter. However, after Coke release the new product, called "New coke”, people all over north America protest and go on riots. After spending huge amount of money on the new product, Coca Cola is forced to switch back to its original product. What is wrong here? Is thin slicing at failure in this case? Not at all! The trick here is that thin slicing works in the right context. Having a sip test is very different from the whole can drink test. as Malcom Gladwell succinctly put it "When we put something in our mouth and in that blink of an eye decide whether it taste good or not, we are reacting not only to the evidence from our taste buds and salivary glands but also to the evidence of our eye and memories and imagination an, and it is foolish of a company to service one dimension and ignore the other".

    Malcom Gladwell

    Source: Blink: the power of thinking without thinking by Malcom Gladwell with little modification by Abiy Getachew.

     Contributed by  Malcom Gladwell 

     

  • Summarized by Abiy Getachew.

    From time to time, you have probably looked at your job description and thought “that is fine, but it is not what I do”. The traditional job description has failed to change along with the work place, nature of job and recent trends of corporate hierarchies.

  • By Adam Grant (prof.)

    In the 1980s, when Steve Jobs was trying to lure John Sculley away from Pepsi to join Apple, he clinched the deal with a single question: “Do you want to sell sugar water for the rest of your life or do you want to come with me and change the world?”

  • By Arianna Huffington.

    In the course of my Thrive book tour, one question has come up over and over again. It goes something like this: it’s all fine and good for people who have already succeeded to care for their well-being, but shouldn’t young people pursue their dreams by burning the candle at both ends? Surely getting by on less sleep and constant-multi-tasking are an express elevator to the top, right?

  • By Abiy Getachew  HST Consulting Plc,

    “How much debt is right for a company?” This is a question my friend asked me the other day when we had coffee together. Even though at that spot I answered him “it depends on the situation (industry, profitability, competitive position and sales volatility) the firm is in”, later that day this very brief conversation brings me back to the corporate finance class which I took some years before. What does an optimal capital structure look like? Is debt better than equity? What is the relationship between capital structure and firm value? How to make a wise investment decision? These were some of the questions which filled my mind right after that conversation. In a way to answer these and other questions I did some research about capital structure which becomes the foundation of this article.The relative proportion of equity (E), debt (D) and other securities that a firm has outstanding constitutes its capital structure (an equity represents ownership interest of shareholders of a company whereas debt represent money borrowed by the company that must be repaid). When a corporation want to raise funds from outside investors, the most common choices are financing through equity alone or financing through a combination of equity and debt. However, some earlier research reveal that the total value of a firm, its share price and its cost of capital is independent of its choice of capital structure. This means, in a perfect capital markets (no taxes and transaction costs), capital structure merely allocates cash flows between debt and equity without affecting the total cash flows to the firm. But capital markets are not perfect in real world, so what is the significance of the (research) result? This is a very common question raised by many people. A brief response may be that all scientific theory begun with a set of idealized assumptions. It is only after we know this that we can measure how much closely the assumptions hold and consider consequence of any major deviations.

    In a real world, the assertion that capital structure will not affect firm value is at odds when we observe that a lot of companies invest significant amount of time both in terms of managerial time and effort and investment banking fees to manage their capital structure. In fact, the choice of leverage is of critical importance to firms’ value and future success in many cases. For instance, in 2018 Awash, Abyssinia, Wegagen, United, Dashen, Oromia COPB and Addis Int bank (all Ethiopian’s banks) have different D to E ratio, though the variation is not as pronounced as firms in different industry (see the Figure 1 below).

    (Here readers should note that I am not implying any performance comparison by stating the D to E ratio).
    If capital structure is unimportant regarding firm value, why we see consistent difference in capital structure across industries and firms? Many previous researches make it clear that capital structure is unimportant in a perfect capital market. Therefore, if capital structure matter, it must stem from market imperfections. One of the most important market imperfections that we will discuss in this text is taxes. Corporations must pay taxes on the income they earn. Because they pay taxes on their profit after interest payments are deducted, interest expense reduces the amount of corporate taxes a firm pay. This means the interest shields the tax the corporation must pay which is usually referred as the interest tax shield. This feature of the tax code creates an incentive to use more debt.
    When a firm uses debt, the interest tax shield provides corporate tax benefits. This means a corporation will pay less taxes when it has debt and pays interest for that than it has no or low debt. This conclusion can easily be illustrated with the Pizza example. No matter how you slice the pizza, it is the same amount you have (a setting in a perfect capital markets). However, assume the tax man get a slice of the pizza as a tax payment for every slice equity holder get, but when debt holders get a slice, there is no tax payment. By allocating more pizza to debt holders, more pizza will be available to investors. Even though the total amount of the pizza does not change, there is more pizza left for investors because less pizza is consumed by the tax man as taxes (in other words the tax man gets a fraction of the smaller pizza allocated to equity holders).
    All the above discussion leads us to one critical question. “Do firms prefer debt as a source of funding for capital expenditure?” Though I could not find compiled data for Ethiopian companies, evidence of US corporation may give us some insight about firms’ behavior. Data from 1975-2011 shows when US firms want to raise new capital, they do so primarily by issuing new debt. But this does not mean that all firms sell debt to raise funds. There are many firms who sell equity to raise funds, but other firms are buying or repurchasing an equal or greater amount of equity. In other words, firms are net purchaser (rather than issuer) of equity whereas they are net issuer of debt. Hence for US firm’s debt is preferred as a source of external financing. However, companies only revert to external sources (E and D) of financing when the internal sources (retained earnings) are not enough. This means retained earnings is firm’s first choice when it comes to capital expenditure. In other words, a pecking order theory holds which says a manger prefer retained earnings and only issue new equity as a last resort.
    Does this mean that firms should use more and more leverage because of the existence of tax advantages for debt financing? Not at all! Studies confirmed that companies should not use the maximum possible amount of debt in their capital structure. Companies should reserve flexibility, a substantial reserve of untapped borrowing power. This is achieved by limiting the amount of debt in capital structure to a certain level even if there is a possibility to borrow more. Excessive leverage may lead a company to financial distress: a situation where it is unable to pay its debt obligations. However, far more significant than financial distress and its attendant cost of bankruptcy is the fact that aggressive use of debt will likely limit the possibility to raise funds quickly on acceptable terms. This leads to liquidity constraints which will reduce the market value of the company. Managers fearful of incurring liquidity constraints will trim strategic expenditure and will not be aggressive in exploiting marketing and investment opportunity. Problems also arise with agency cost of monitoring loan covenants, property mortgages and performance management as the firm need guarantee proper payment of debt obligations. In fact, according to some research agency costs may become highly prohibitive especially as debt approaches 20% to 30% of the capital market value (debt as a fraction of total firm value).
    Even financial distress and bankruptcy cost which we consider to be not significant, can sometimes be so significant that each may completely offset the benefit of interest tax shield. For instance, bankruptcy is a long and complicated process which imposes both direct and indirect costs on the firm and its investors. Though the bankruptcy code is designed to provide an orderly process for settling a firm’s debt, the process is still complex, time-consuming and costly. When a firm becomes financially distress, it usually hires outside professional including legal and accounting experts, consultants, appraisers and investment bankers which are usually costly. In addition to direct legal and administrative cost, there are also several indirect costs associated with financial distress whether a firm has filed for bankruptcy. Even though these costs are mostly difficult to measure they are much larger than the direct cost of bankruptcy. An example of these costs includes loss of customers, loss of suppliers, loss of employees and loss of receivables.
    In summary, a company’s chief financial officer (CFO) need to ask a series of questions to determine the right amount of debt in the capital structure. These questions include but not limited to: how much additional money the company needs to raise in the next 3 to 5 years to carry out its strategies? Can it can be deferred without incurring large organizational and opportunity cost? What are the lending criteria of each target sources? Will the company debt policy allow a flow of funds to all strategically important programs even in the event of adversity? Will the company be competitively vulnerable if it achieves its target capital structure? This means a CFO need to weigh the tax benefit of debt against loss of flexibility and costs associated with bankruptcy and financial distress to determine the right amount of debt in the company. Nevertheless, in order to apply this core concept, it is needless to say that the existence of financial markets (capital markets) is indispensable. Unfortunately, as a nation we are new to financial markets and because of its nonexistence we lost many promising investment opportunities. On the contrary, we invest on many bad investments (sometimes) purely because of the lack of detail financial information. Hence, it is important to build awareness about financial engineering among all business stakeholders so that our industries may benefit from the resource effectiveness stemmed from the use of such value creation model.

  • HST has launched it's graduate onboarding program as part of it's corporate social responsibility initiative, for Economics and Business 2019 graduates ,free of charge. The program focuses on Banking and Insurance basics, Ethics and Professional Practices in the work place.

  • HST & EMI (Ethiopian Management Institute) signed on MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) to work together.
    The MoU is signed yesterday at Hilton Addis with the attendance of various stakeholders.
    For more detail, pls find the attachedJoint press statement.
     
     
     
  • HST Consulting is offering the following short training programs at its premises

    1. Modern Office Management Skills

    2. Advanced Excel for Finance

    3. Presentation Skills

    4. Digital Marketing Skills

    Duration: Half-Day (April 22-25, 2020)

    Venue: Addis Ababa, Wollo Sefer Mina Building, HST Consulting, 4th floor

    Registration: Call Us for prices and Reserve Your Seat!!

    Phone:+251 5585109 

  • Financier Worldwide canvasses the opinions of leading professionals around the world on

    the latest trends in global tax. GLOBAL TAX ANNUAL REVIEW 2020.PDF 

  • On September 17,2019 HST and CAPITAL news paper has conducted a regional conference entitled "privatization and stock market, imperatives for Ethiopia’s Economic Development?" At the UNECA hall, the event featured 6 papers on the issues. Panelists debated on the topics, participants actively reflected on the issues and took part in the debate.
    The medias interest were also keen. HST hopes to continue entertaining an enlightened discussion. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all who had some sort of contribution to the success of the event. We would also like to receive a follow up ideas on any of the issues. 

  • ARE YOU FRUSTRATED BYTHE

    JOBMARKET?

    We have developed the capability to quickly track and propose the right candidate for targeted job positions.

    By joining our recruitment website:

    (hst-recruit.com)


     

    • We shorten the time of screening, selection and deployment of talent for you. Delivering quality service at speed

    • You can rate candidates, submit interview feedback and include comments for making important hiring decisions right away.

    …Here is how we can help

     With our experienced industry experts, various tools, and selection techniques, we select the best candidates from our talent pool to best match your unique organizational needs.

     …And if you are curious about who we are

    For  the  last  17+  years, we  have

    been serving diverse industries providing quality services in the areas of audit, tax, corporate finance, strategy, human capital, and learning solutions. This gives us the opportunity to witness firsthand the relevance of talent in the industries we serve. Together with our clients, we have devised tailored and sustainable talent solutions powered by our highly qualified multi-disciplinary professionals.

       • We provide programs for the entire life cycle of an   employee, from initial hiring and onboarding to
     advancement and senior leadership.

       • By joining our online platform, you will have access to   top talent which can match to your company-specific
     requirements.

     

     You can easily get registered to our recruitment website on   (https://hst- recruit.com) and experience the unique features of our services.

     

                            www.hst-recruit.com | +251 115 52 76 66, P.O. Box 2570| rThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

  • Even though change management has been in existence for over half a century and companies invest a lot in tools and trainings, most research shows a constant failure rate of 60-70% for organizational change initiatives (McKinsey & Company). Does this imply that all we know about change management is wrong? Should we divert from the Kotter eight success factors and go to the drawing board and start a fresh? Should we abandon the main elements of the change management framework such as engagement, communication, small wins and building the business case?
    While it may be reasonable to rethink the basics, scholars and practitioners unanimously agree that the content of change management is reasonable correct. The problem arises mainly because the managerial capacity to implement change is woefully underdeveloped (Ashkenes, 2013). This applies not only to organization wide change but also for change within a piece of it, for instance HR transformation.
    Successful HR transformation will benefit the business in multiple ways. First it helps to develop personal competencies which is needed to deliver personal, stakeholder and business result. Second it helps to directly develop business capabilities which are important to deliver business result. In other words, HR transformation helps to:

    • Build competencies used to deliver personal, stakeholder and business result (A),
    • Build an effective HR department (B) and
    • Build business capabilities (C), all with tremendous business result (D) (Fig 1).

    Hence, the most important question to ask is how to pursue a successful HR transformation? And how to make that change sustainable?
    In an effort to answer the above questions, this article is organized as follows: first we discuss what HR transformation really mean and why organization need to pursue it. Following it, we outline the process of HR transformation along with the major success factors and its implication for Ethiopian companies. Lastly, we conclude by summarizing the key points to consider when conducting HR transformation.
    The business world has seen arguably the most disruptive change in the last nine months than the last nine years which brings a new and urgent demand for change. In the midst of COVID induced recession, some industries are in the verge of extinction while some few gain a momentum upward profit. In this context, HR faces a unique challenge and probably needs to redefine how it works within an organization. In other words, HR needs to pursue a true transformation that demands an integrated, aligned, innovative and business focus approach. In that sense, HR transformation is not equal to efficiency gain and should not be done in isolation. It should not also be initiated by the whim of some individuals. And it is successfully completed only when it helped to implement the business strategy and drive business result.
    However, the old way of thinking that this process takes more time, rely on heavy process and should start from inside the company is no more useful and valid. The current unique situation requires a fast, slim, and an outside-in approach where HR transformation should focus on its impacts on external stakeholders who matter to the company. In other words, HR transformation begins with an understanding of the business context (both the general conditions and specific stakeholder situations) and translate this into business strategy that feeds to HR Re-design.
    While stakeholder measure primary tracks the outcome of HR transformation as a recipient of transformation, HR transformation has far more impact within organization and outside. For instance, a successful HR transformation should change the culture, identity, and image of the company. This means it will enable the company to build these capabilities which result in huge impact on the business. Ultimately, these capabilities become the identity of the firm, part and parcel of deliverables of HR practices and will be key in implementing business strategy.
    Even though there is no magic list of ideal capabilities, the following seems to be an inherent outcome of successful HR transformation in a well-managed firm.

    • Talent attraction
    • Motivation and Retention
    • Speed in making important decisions
    • Shared mindset
    • Accountability
    • Collaboration and Learning
    • Customer connection
    • Innovation
    • Strategic unity
    • Simplicity in strategies, process and products
    • Social responsibility
    • Risk anticipation and Management
    • Efficiency

    However, the HR transformation team should do a capability audit to identify those capabilities which are critical for the organization’s future success. With those prioritized capabilities, scorecard may be created, and progress can be track from the base line.
    Practitioners in HR transformation suggest four core phases to pursue effective change. First, the process should start with a clear rational for why transformation matters. This is building the case for why organization do transformation. The second phase is to clarify the expected outcome from transformation. Following this is to redesign HR which answers the question of how we do transformation. Lastly the process focuses on transferring ownership to line mangers and strategist to create sustained change.
    Within the four core phases, the pieces come together in milestones, activities, and outcomes. HR practitioners who have worked with many companies (both which have succeeded or faulted in HR transformation) identified 13 milestones, outcomes and activities to turn these phases into action plans. However, the duration of transformation may vary from organization to organization depending on the unique organizational culture, level of anticipated change, expected resistance and degree of support from the broader organization.
    But even with a carful description of the phases and detail of doing HR transformation, change is difficult, and many people not only resist it but try to undermine it. Hence it is not surprising that many studies found that only a third of change initiatives succeed. Hence, the issue here is, what factors distinguish successful HR transformation than those with partially success or complete failure? Several research in change management mention several factors like empowerment, incremental change, and key stone change. Since the factors are many and varied, it is difficult to arrive at an exhaustive list. However, one comprehensive study (lead by Dave Ulric and his team) which is made for the last 20 years on effective organizational change shed light on the issue and hence better to skim the cream.
    According to that research, the major success factor is to have the leadership support for the change. This is a measure of the extent of having public and legitimate leadership inside and outside HR. Successful HR transformation also rely more on having a shared need of why the organization do transformation and developing a clear sense of outcomes of transformation. Moreover, mobilizing commitment from key individuals and knowing the decision that needs to be made are key in moving the transformation forward. However, all these conditions will not bring sustainable transformation unless the change is integrated with business activities and a blueprint of it is tracked, refined and adjusted while learning is taken from the transformation during the process.
    Can we adapt the outlined process to local firms? That may be the primary question which readers of this article may ask. As many developing countries, Ethiopian human resource practice is different from the west due to differences in cultural factors, economic systems, political and legal systems and industrial relations. It is at a rudimentary state where most of the practices is done randomly and without any strategy, mainly because of Ethiopia’s limited experience in industrialization. Hence, a tremendous improvement in HR practices can be achieved by following the outlined approach, which in turn accelerate the transformation to strategic human resource practices in all areas of HR. Of course, the level of resistance and leadership buy in may initially work against the change. But never lose hope as this might take some time to reach its critical mass.
    Overall, if done successfully, HR transformation will greatly contribute to deliver personal, stakeholder and business result. Explicitly, personal effectiveness, value for internal and external stakeholders and business competitiveness. Effective HR transformation produce in business result because it equips the HR department with capability to impact the business performance. Out of these capabilities, the one with the highest business impacts are employee practice (HR policy/practices used for employees), Capability support (HR effectiveness at supporting capabilities) and Stakeholder value (HR design to deliver values to stakeholders).

    Abiy Getachew Sime is Senior Consultant at HST consulting PLC
    You can reach at him at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

  • TAX UPDATES

    Revisions on excise tax

    The New Proclamation issued on February 13, 2020, proposes to impose the tax on goods that are believed to be luxurious, hazardous to health, causes social problems as well as on basic goods which are demand inelastic. Moreover, it replaces the production cost-based assessment of the tax to the ex-factory price method of assessment. This would help to relieve the problem of unpredictability on the amount of tax the taxpayers are liable to pay. Thirdly, the new law aims to address the challenges in the collection of excise tax that emanated from the inadequacies of the Repealed Proclamation.

    Scope of Application:Excise tax will be applicable on 19 groups of items and 378 goods. In terms of coverage, excise tax is broadened to include motorcycles, plastic bags, wigs and human hair, fireworks, and artificial flowers, which previously were not included in the tax net. On the other hand, some items such as laundry and dish washing machines, clocks and watches that were previously subject to excise tax were removed.

    Requirement of a license

    The new Proclamation introduces a new requirement that was not previously mandatory. Eligible taxpayers are required to be licensed by the tax authority before engaging in the importation and production of goods or rendering of services.

    Eligibility

    License requirement is applicable to those who manufacture excisable goods in Ethiopia and import excisable goods. The Ministry of Finance may further impose a requirement of license on any other activity.

    Exemption:

    Under the Repealed Proclamation, goods that are not included on the Schedule of taxable goods were deemed to have been exempted from the payment of excise tax. Under the New Proclamation, there are detailed rules on exemptions. The list of exempt goods is exhaustively provided under Schedule II. Goods that fulfill the requirements of Schedule II are exempted. Among others, excisable goods exported under custom control and exports of excisable service, excisable goods destroyed by the manufacturer at the presence of the officials of the Authority, and supply of goods to entities that are exempt from excise tax by law are exempted from payment of excise tax. 

    In addition to this, the MoF may exempt goods and services considering economic, social and administrative reasons. The excise tax is not applicable when excisable goods are destroyed or lost due to accident or other cause in the course of removal of goods from the factory by the manufacturer or before removal, or while the goods are onboard in aircraft or vessel in their way to Ethiopia. This exemption would not  apply if the taxpayer is compensated for the damage and such compensation includes excise tax.

    Find us on the Web: www.hst-et.com

    E mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


    Base of computation [the tax base]

    The base of computation of excise tax under the Repealed Proclamation was based on goods produced locally and goods imported. The tax would be imposed on locally produced goods based on the cost of production. On the imported goods, the tax was imposed on the cost, insurance and freight (CIF) and the custom duty. Under the New Proclamation, the value on which the excise tax to be imposed will be determined based on (i) excisable value of goods or service or (ii) the quantity of goods. 

    Refunds

    Under the Repealed Proclamation, excise tax paid on import of inputs that are used to produce textile and textile products and vehicles assembly locally are deductible from excise tax. The New Proclamation expands this privilege to other sectors specifically to goods imported or manufactured that have been used as raw materials in the manufacture of finished goods. The excise tax paid on the raw materials will be set off against the excise tax payable on the final goods. This relief is not applicable to alcohol, tobacco and sugar products. The new Proclamation permits the refund of excise tax paid by the taxpayer when the goods have been damaged or stolen during transportation to Ethiopia or while subject to excise control, when the buyer returned the goods based on a contract of sale, or when the purchaser unable to repay due to insolvency.

    Penalties

    The manufacturing and importation of excisable products without having the license or manufacture of goods at a place not specified on the license entails an administrative penalty. The penalty will be to pay double of the excise tax that would have been payable if the person were licensed. The New Proclamation further provides various criminal liabilities for violation of the excise tax law.

    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

    Getu Jemaneh

    Partner | Tax and Business Support Services

    Ethio–China Friendship Ave Mina Building 4th & 5th Floor

    Tel: +251 115 58 51 47 | Mobile: +251 930034377

    Fax: +251 115 52 83 84

    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

    Mamo Abdi

    Senior Manager |Tax & BSS

    Ethio–China Friendship Ave Mina Building 5th Floor

    Tel: +251 115 58 51 47 | Mobile: +251 932 518811

    Fax: +251 115 52 83 84

    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.